There are many problems with the claim the Quran is preserved here is a summary:

1. The Quran was only put as one book 20 years after Muhammad died!! Before that, it was scattered as scrolls written on stones, leather, and bits of papers! This opens a can of worms as to why Muhammad or Allah never asked for the book to be collated before Muhammad died! (I have another post about that!)
2. The four scribes (even the hadith cannot agree in their names!), did not survive. How can we trust a no body by Zaid Ibn Tabith to remember 114 chapters with 6,350 verse in the correct order? He is no Prophet, Khalifa, Iman…no body!!
3. Too many repetitions that do not make sense until you realise Muhammad was getting old and forgetful as the authentic hadith says in multiple places:
4. Narrated Aisha: The Prophet heard a man reciting the Qur’an in the mosque and said, “May Allah bestow His Mercy on him, as he has reminded me of such-and-such Verses of such a Surah.”
Sahih Bukhari 6:61:556
Repeated in: Sahih Muslim 4:1720
And Quran 87:6:
We will have you recite ˹the Quran, O  Prophet,˺ so you will not forget
4.Islamic source confirm that the caliph Uthman ordered various copies of the Qur’an to be burnt because there were clear differences in the Qur’ans among people of Sham and people of Iraq. The differences were so great Uthman and his companions feared future dispute. Uthman asked Hafsa for her copy and he ordered to make many copies and destroy all the other copies. This shows that memorization had failed to completely preserve the Qur’an.
5. The compilation of the Qur’an was clearly a very human process involving trial and error, educated guesses, faulty memories, fallible opinions, disagreements, mistakes, ignorance, and bad decisions. And we can’t forget, of course, the pile of manuscripts reduced to ashes by Uthman in his desperate attempt to destroy all evidence that the Qur’an hadn’t been perfectly preserved. The early Muslim community left modern Muslims with a huge mess to clean up if they want to cling to the belief that the Qur’an was perfectly preserved as you can see in these hadiths: https://sunnah.com/muslim:1050
https://sunnah.com/bukhari:4987

The claim that humans are made of clay is also found in Egyptian and Greek mythology. Google it! The idea that a god fashioned us from clay is a joke…but the Quran repeats it not once but…listen to this 16 times: Quran 3:49, 5:110, 6:2, 7:12, 15:26, 15:28, 15:33, 15:74, 17:61, 23:12, 28:38, 32:7, 37:11, 38:71, 38:75, and 55:14.

In fact to make sure they are no confusion verse 55:14 says “He created humankind from ˹sounding˺ clay like pottery”. This link gives you 8 translation, all scientifically proven to be wrong:

https://quran.com/55/14?translations=18,20,19,101,85,84,22,21,17,95

What about how did Allah create animals? Muhammad did not care to come up with a story. So, officially, animals are made from nothing. Whereas man is made of clay and woman from a man’s rib – genetically a joke as she would have XY chromosomes – but Muhammad did not know that!

So this is what we have in the Quran:

Quran 15:26

Similarly, it says that the first man was created from dust (turabin تُرَابٍ).

Lo! the likeness of Essa with Allah is as the likeness of Adam. He created him of dust, then He said unto him: Be! and he is.

Quran 3:59

Sorry, we have so much evidence around us about evolution. What we don’t have is ANY EVIDENCE that the man is made from clay or dust…and woman from man’s rib.

But why did these cultures make this mistake? Because when they opened old graves, they can see the person has become dirt, mud, or dust. Thus assuming we were made of these. What they did not appreciate is that these are the breakdown of the decomposed body from maggots. We are biological being where 70% made of water.

Scientists have mapped our human evolution and have learnt many things about how we evolved over 200,000 years. The evidence comes from full bones, graveyards all over the world, and study of our DNA.

Human Species discovered other than Homo sapiens (us humans):
Homo erectus
Homo floresiensis
Homo habilis
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo luzonensis
Homo naledi
Homo neanderthalensis

What made us who we are now is 2 million years of evolution. You need a level IQ to understand it. To accept the Quranic narrative, you just need to be a sponge!

World Health Organisation (WHO) warns of DANGER to life from drinking camel urine. So, do not do it. Here is the link: https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/06/08/who-to-avoid-mers-dont-drink-camel-urine/

Note WHO does not warn DANGER to life from eating pork. Over 60% of the world eats pork, and they are fine.

But Muhammad claimed it is a treatment to stomach upsets. Here is the evidence and the story has a disturbing ending.

“Some people from the tribe of ‘Ukl came to the Prophet and embraced Islam. The climate of Medina did not suit them, so the Prophet ordered them to go to the (herd of milch) camels of charity and to drink, their milk and urine (as a medicine).”
Sahih Bukhari 8:82:794 / Sahih Muslim 16:4130

But what happened next is shocking:

The climate of Medina did not suit some people, so the Prophet (ﷺ) ordered them to follow his shepherd, i.e. his camels, and drink their milk and urine (as a medicine). So they followed the shepherd that is the camels and drank their milk and urine till their bodies became healthy. Then they killed the shepherd and drove away the camels. When the news reached the Prophet (ﷺ) he sent some people in their pursuit. When they were brought, he cut their hands and feet and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron.
Sahih al-Bukhari 5686
https://sunnah.com/bukhari:5686

This story makes no sense! It is missing motive. If the drinking of the camel urine and milk worked, and they have converted to Islam, then why in the world would the whole tribe kill the shepherd!?

The only scenario that makes sense is that the camel urine did not make them feel better, under pressure they converted but left Islam. The shepherd most likely have got very aggressive and angry! Even their punishment is unusual! If their crime is murder, they should have been executed. This is vengeful. Muhammad was angry that they rejected his medicine more than anything else. I think the killing of the shepherd is a lie because with every story, we get the full names of the individual. With this, we don’t! He is made up.

Overtime, I noticed a trend. Brothers and sisters, visit us with lots of confidence built by years and years of brainwashing and living in that bubble of ‘Islam is perfect’ – despite seeing lots of issues – they are regularly insisting that there is an explanation for everything.

They visit my page and the shit hits the fan, the bubble is burst, and they go into a panic and angry posts. They assume I am Christian_or_hindu and start posting and messaging me…I respond with lots of love – explaining I am ExMuslim and I am atheist – I do not give a shit about the other faiths.

Then they argue I am not real Ex_Muslims, until I answer them with knowledge of Islam that they cannot argue with. In some instances, they even insist to talk to me in Quranic Arabic and I respond. Then I get the three types:

1- Some go quiet and just tries to absorb the shock. Sometimes they just block me.
2- Some continues posting pointless verses from the Quran not having anything to answer – or insults where they can. Trying hard to poke anything – with limited success.
3- Some who believe the POWER of ALLAH (who created the whole universe) is now in the hands of the moderators. HELP – they scream…and starts reporting any post they dislike – even though Allah Himself could not help them. They seek help from the infidels.

But all three cases have had their bubble burst…and it may take days, weeks, months, or years…but they will not help but think: “So, Islam is not really perfect! Where do I go from here?”

And just like that…my job is done.

You probably came across many Abdul names and never stopped to ask, what does it mean? Abdul is a servant and Abdul on its own is not correct. It has to come with something to become Islamic.

Abdul-lah (Servant Allah)
Abdul-Rahman (Servant of the Forgiver), Abdul-Razaq (Servant of the Provider), Abdul-Karem (Servant of the Generous), Abdul-Hakim (Servant of the Wise)…all popular names meaning servant of Allah’s and Allah has 99 names.

Where did these 99 name come from? This will surprise you. The Quran! Yes, the Quran uses the terms Al-Rahman, Al-Razaq, Al-Karem…etc in reference to Allah.

Yet if you go through the list, there are some shocking “names” of Allah.

You will not find anyone calling their son:

Abdul-Da’r (الضار Servant of the Harmful),
Abdul-AlMudil (المضل Servant of the deceiver),
Abdul-Muzil (المذل – Servant of the Humiliator),
Abdul-Moqet (المقيت Servant of the Abominator),
Abdul-Mutakabir (المتكبر – Servant of the Arrogant )…

Yet these are also Allah’s names too! Why? Are the believers embarrassed by Allah’s somewhat unpleasant names? They will happily justify these names as “needed” from an all powerful god, but it seems an all-powerful god cannot use all powerful goodness to win but rather need to be harmful, deceitful, enjoys humiliation, abomination , and rather arrogant about it!

But then, also, what I said many times before. The majority of muslims are better than Islam. Intentionally or otherwise, they look for what is good and distance themselves from the bad. And one further step away from this religion is all we hope they reach the same conclusion we reached. Islam without lies, dies.

Prophet Mohammed said to his followers ” Invade tabuk and your spoils will be the daughters of Al Asfar(blonde white women)

One of his followers named Al Jadd said to Mohammed infront of all the Muslims ” draw me not into trail and don’t tempt me with blonde women because I don’t want to commit sin and allow me not to accompany you to tabuk”

Mohammed get  angry with this men and a Quran verse came down concerning him.

Sura 9:49 Tafser of al Tabari

“Among them is a man who says grant me exemption and Don’t draw me into trail, have they not fallen into trail already? Indeed hell surrounds the unbelievers on all sides” it was mentioned this verse came regarding a man named Al Jadd b qais, this was in reference to a men who said to the prophet give command so I don’t accompany you don’t tempt me with the daughters of al asfar(white blonde women from Roman Byzantines)
Tafser al Tabari, Q, 9:49

Why Jadd suddenly turned into kafir and why Allah sending him to hell fire for not wanting to commit sin?

Isn’t this sad promising sex here on earth and in heaven to recruit an army that can fight for you blindly without any questions or any opposition.

Allowing the Muslim army the spoils of war including taking women and children as a slave and taking married captive women as a sex slave while her husband is alive and Allowing her Muslim owner can have sex with her and her daughters and sell them any time they want.

This is the secret and the motivation of the Muslim army who conquered the known world.

You won’t get this translated to English because Islam without lies, dies! But here are multiple Islamic sources in Arabic. Just use Google or any translation app you have and read.

اغزوا تغنموا بنات الأصفر و نساء الروم

https://www.islamweb.net/ar/library/index.php?page=bookcontents&idfrom=2323&idto=2323&bk_no=50&ID=2335

https://gate.ahram.org.eg/News/2050053.aspx

Muhammad claimed eating 7 dates would stop you getting poisoned.
https://sunnah.com/bukhari:5779

Read what the AUTHENTIC HADITH tells us happened to him. How he suffered for four years and eventually killed him. Here is a clue, “he did not eat 7 dates one morning.” 狼

Here is the story
Muhammad was poisoned by a Jewish woman, following the conquest of Khaibar, and ordered the torture and beheading of their, the chief of the Jews as well as killing of all men.

Narrated Anas bin Malik: A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, “Shall we kill her?” He said, “No.” I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah’s Apostle .

Sahih Bukhari 3:47:786

Narrated ‘Aisha: The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O ‘Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.”

Sahih Bukhari 5:59:713

The reason behind her action was the killing of her people and family by Muhammad.

The apostle of Allah sent for Zaynab and said to her, “What induced you to do what you have done?” She replied, “You have done to my people what you have done. You have killed my father, my uncle and my husband, so I said to myself, “If you are a prophet, the foreleg will inform you; and others have said, “If you are a king we will get rid of you.”

Ibn Sa’d p. 252

It was no secret among the wives, that Aisha was Muhammad’s favorite, and he made this clear as death approached.

Narrated ‘Aisha: that during his fatal ailment, Allah’s Apostle, used to ask his wives, “Where shall I stay tomorrow? Where shall I stay tomorrow?” He was looking forward to Aisha’s turn. So all his wives allowed him to stay where he wished.

Sahih Bukhari 7:62:144

He came out with the help of two men and his legs were dragging on the ground. He was between Al-Abbas and another man [Ali Ibn Abi Talib].”….

Sahih Bukhari 1:11:634

Eventually, he died. Why you never heard of this before? Because it is an embarrassing. According to Islam, Allah never allowed any of his prophets be killed!! Even Essa (Jesus).

Everything you need to know about the characteristics of a cult leader is in the post. What more do you need? The facts are from the Quran and Hadith. And while we have tried to put a spin on it to claim “the money was used for the poor” but first and foremost it is Muhammad and his relatives – feeding his many wives and many many servants and slaves of which we know he had at least 21. Muhammad did not have a job. The “offering of women” while Quran 33:50 is translated as “..if the prophet wishes to marry them” the term marry here is a “polite” translation of the word يَسْتَنكِحَهَا which the exact translation is to f#@k her!

Still thinking, was our prophet not a cult leader? Tell me what more would he need to do to become a cult leader in your books? Wage wars, he did. Get people to idiolise him, he did. Check verse 33:21.

In most of the Western World, reported cases of sexual violence against women shot up significantly in the aftermath of the “MeToo” movement. Not because suddenly there were more attacks on women. No. Because women felt safe to report incidents that they were either too afraid or felt the police will not take them seriously. Don’t kid yourself. This is happening in the Islamic countries and we know it. In our culture where women are blamed for the attack on them, even when they are fully veiled, you get perpetrators who will say “she tempted me” and the blame suddenly falls completely on her!

Whenever someone comes to market this false narrative that some Islamic countries are safer for women because they have less attacks on them …stop there and emphasize “REPORTED” attacks. Remind them of the above facts and if they are honest with themselves, they will realise they cannot rely on the statistics coming from these countries.

The الفتوحات الاسلامية or Islamic expansions is something we celebrate in our religion classes. What we learn is that Islam expanded to Iraq, Palestine, Syria,Turkey, Russia north, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Morocco, and Spain West, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, parts of India and China – East.  What these lessons never talk about is the brutality, human costs, and unnecessary suffering.

What motivated these expansion is ultimately wealth and sex – more than faith!! Here is why…Islamic fighters would go into a battle believing with full certainty that if they die, they go to heaven with palaces and countless mindless virgin – this promise comes in the Quran itself! And should they survive? They get a bounty share of the the wealth as well as women slaves as sex bounty known as ملك اليمين “What your right hand possess”. What was the human cost of Islamic expansions? Most historian would not dared to put full estimate for fear of being labeled “Islamophobic”.

The one historian who dared is Kishori Saran Lal in a book titled “Growth of Muslim Population in Medieval India (1000-1800) published in 1973.

The book assesses the demographics of India between 1000 CE and 1500 CE and concludesthat the population of Indian subcontinent in 1000 was about 200 million and in 1500 was about 170 million. Thus, Lal estimates that about 60 to 80 million people died in India between 1000 and 1525 as a result of the Islamic invasion of Indian subcontinent. He concluded that about 2 million people died during Mahmud of Ghazni’s invasions of India alone!

This is just estimate of just 500 years of failed invasions of India! Can anyone help me guess what is the human costs for the other places? That is before we add to it the constant infighting between different fractions of Islam.

Don’t get angry with me for sharing our history! Go read it for yourself from any source you like…but remember the human costs for the nations that lost are not no-bodies. These were civilisations with diverse cultures and traditions, languages, and art. Wipped out with a black flag of “No god but Allah!”

We need to face up to our faith….it is far from being anything but a religion of peace!